Thursday, 13 May 2010

In which men should be men

In recent years, the image of men in the press has taken a definite turn for the more metrosexual. We’ve seen pictures of David Beckham in his sarong (shudder) and seen stories about how much time men spend in the bathroom, just they and their vanity.

This is all well and good: after all, it’s nice to have a man who actually listens when one’s talking; who can wield a recipe book with some ease; and who’ll have something pinchable in his bathroom cabinet for when the stubble rash gets just too scratchy to be bearable.

But I spent my formative years at a particularly pushy girls’ school. A huge majority of my fellow Old Girls (as we’re so delightfully known) are just as, ahem, spirited as I am. We spent a long time being told that we could do absolutely bloody anything we wanted (although in my case, that comes with the exception of being able to eat lunch al desko without spilling it all into the keyboard).

That background has led to my being rather non-plussed when faced with Potential Men who display too much of their metrosexual side. They don’t particularly strike me as deeply empathetic and caring – they’re just a bit wet. After all, if I wanted a long and detailed conversation about the perfect malachite bathroom tile, I’d go for dinner with a girlfriend.

And so it was with a sigh of relief that I read an article in Shortlist this morning, about reclaiming manliness for the men (although I don’t know how happy I am about the term ‘rogue male’ to describe them. In my experience, men don’t need any encouragement to be rogues).

Thanks to the popularity of such role models as Bear Grylls, and the lovely Don Draper, a resurgence of a little machismo is apparently what’s called for.


This is music to my ears. Whilst it is lovely to be listened to attentively whilst I’m on my soapbox, or told that a new jacket is particularly flattering, I do like my men to be men. I like them to eat steak, drink whisky and have a bafflingly large capacity for all kinds of sports trivia.

When members of Social Circle Blonde go away for the weekend, I’m fine with the fact that it’s the gals who’ll do the cooking whilst the boys ooh and aah over what’s under the bonnet of someone’s latest toy. I’m okay with it, because I know that they’ll also display the equally manly characteristics of gallantry and courtesy that frankly make the world a far nicer place for everyone.

I’m more than capable of looking after, and standing up for, myself in any sphere of my life: I can defend decisions I’ve made, and I can put up a shelf. But it’s nice when there are men out there who’ll take it upon themselves to do it for me; whose shoulders I can snuggle under whilst they feel they’d like to do it on my behalf. It’s very welcome, and I don’t take it as a slight, but the gesture of care and protection that it’s intended to be.

And if that resurgence of manliness means that there will be fewer discussions about bathroom tiles over dinner, then I’m all for it.


HC said...

Spirited indeed.

I can just about overlook your dissing of Beckham, only a real man can wear a skirt .... and his wife's underwear and get away with it.

Question then, Gerard Butler (in 300, not P.S. I Love You), or Christian Bale (a la American Psycho (without the murderous tendencies but with the same taste in music))?

Helena Halme said...

Hear, hear. (Can you tell I'm been in a political Whitehall vortex for eh past week or so...?)

Anyway, I love my men to be masculine as long as they don't pee on toilet seats.

Helena xx

Brennig said...

'What's-under-the-bonnet' talk is all very well and good in an appropriate place, at an appropriate time, but sometimes I just want to do other things. And I'm far vtoo individual to follow boy-gangs like some kind of sheep.

Blonde said...

HC: Huh. A good question. Not having seen 300 nor AP (have read t'book), I'm going to say Clive Owen in Closer.

HH: That's nothing to do with masculinity - that's just bad manners. Eww.

Bren: Wanting to do other things, at other times, is fine so long as you're not wet about. Tis the key (and frankly, in my experience, any man who can cope throwing beasts round XC courses tends not to be wet).

HC said...

Did you see him on stage? I didn't read about him being accosted...

P said...

The last guy I went out with straightened his hair.

I found that weird.

Mind you, he WAS an actor.

But his hair was short!!! And not curly!!!

Blonde said...

HC: I didn't. Sadly. I'd have liked to though. Very much. Ahem.

P: Oooh no - that's not manly at all!

Lydia said...

Hi, nice blog & good post. You have beautifully maintained it, you must try this website which really helps to increase your traffic. hope u have a wonderful day & awaiting for more new post. Keep Blogging!

roseski said...

I agree.

I went for a manicure last week, and in walked a guy in a well cut suit. I assumed he was there to pick up his girlfriend but, alas no, he was there for a manicure. He didn't *look* gay, but what girl would want her boyfriend doing that?!

theperpetualspiral said...

I feel I should admit that I moisturised my face this morning.

In my defence, it was to sooth my sunburn from yesterday.

Hamish said...

Eat steak - Check
Drink Whisky - Check
Talk Sports - Check but it's NOT trivia dear

Thank God. I am not as extinct as I thought.

(Still wear a "dress" though. Albeit at Hogmanay )

nuttycow said...

Completely agree. As you knew I would!

Hope all is well. Sorry for radio silence... am a busy lady at the moment.

heybartender said...

I love you, Blonde, but you lost me at "sports trivia." Men can be men and still be completely ignorant of team sports.

Post a Comment


Blog Template by
Sponsored by Free Web Space